Gold vs NASDAQ 100: Which Was the Better Investment?

A $10,000 investment in Gold in 2010 would be worth $40,792 as of August 2026, versus $172,284 for NASDAQ 100 — NASDAQ 100 came out ahead over this period, based on real historical price data.

⚖️ Head-to-Head · Historical
Gold vs NASDAQ 100
$10,000 invested in each since 2010 · ~17 years
Gold
$40,792
4.1× · 8.8%/yr
NASDAQ 100 Winner
$172,284
17.2× · 18.7%/yr
$10,000
Each start
2010
Start year
8.8%
Gold /yr
18.7%
NASDAQ 100 /yr

This compares Gold and NASDAQ 100 over the exact same window — $10,000 invested in each at the start of 2010 and held to today, about 17 years. Over that stretch NASDAQ 100 came out ahead, ending roughly 4.2× higher than Gold. The chart and table below show how the gap opened up year by year, all from real historical closing prices.

Growth of $10,000 — Gold vs NASDAQ 100 2010 → Today
Starting amount (each)$10,000
Gold today$40,792
NASDAQ 100 today$172,284
Gold annual return8.8%/yr
NASDAQ 100 annual return18.7%/yr

Frequently Asked Questions

Has Gold or NASDAQ 100 performed better historically?

Over the period both have traded (2010–today, about 17 years), NASDAQ 100 was the stronger performer: a $10,000 investment grew to $172,284, versus $40,792 for Gold. This is measured from real historical prices over their common history, so both assets are compared over the exact same window.

How much would $10,000 in Gold vs NASDAQ 100 be worth today?

Starting in 2010, $10,000 in Gold would be worth $40,792 today (4.1× your money, about 8.8% a year), while the same amount in NASDAQ 100 would be worth $172,284 (17.2×, about 18.7% a year).

Does past performance mean NASDAQ 100 is the better investment going forward?

No. This comparison shows what already happened, not what will happen. Past returns don't predict future results, and the winner over one period can lag badly over another — especially higher-volatility assets, which can swing sharply in both directions. Use it to understand history, not as a forecast.

How is the Gold vs NASDAQ 100 comparison calculated?

Both start with the same amount on the same date and are grown forward using each asset's real monthly closing prices over the window they share, so the two lines are always directly comparable. No contributions, fees, or taxes are modeled — it's a clean like-for-like lump-sum comparison.